Calcutt v. FDIC
Decided May 22, 2023. The Court ruled per curiam, an unsigned opinion of the Court.
Docket 22-714 · 598 U.S. 623 (2023) · Cited 36 times
Holding
After determining that the FDIC had made two legal errors in adjudicating petitioner’s case, the Sixth Circuit’s proper course was to remand the matter back to the FDIC for further consideration; the Sixth Circuit erred by conducting its own review of the record and affirming the FDIC’s sanctions against petitioner based on a legal rationale different from the one adopted by the FDIC.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp. · 332 U.S. 194 (1947)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co. · 394 U.S. 759 (1969)
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · 371 U.S. 156 (1962)
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · 470 U.S. 729 (1985)
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · 537 U.S. 12 (2002)
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · 503 U.S. 258 (1992)
- Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York · 559 U.S. 1 (2010)
- Gonzales v. Thomas · 547 U.S. 183 (2006)
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co. · 344 U.S. 17 (1952)
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty. · 554 U.S. 527 (2008)
Official text
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)
Explore from here
All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2023). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).