Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A.

Decided May 30, 2024. Brett M. Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 22-529 · 602 U.S. 205 (2024) · Cited 7 times

Holding

The Second Circuit failed to analyze whether New York’s interest-on-escrow law is preempted as applied to national banks in a manner consistent with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. v. Nelson, 517 U. S. 25.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 9–0.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Anderson National Bank v. Luckett · 321 U.S. 233 (1944)
• Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson · 517 U.S. 25 (1996)
• Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin Square v. New York · 347 U.S. 373 (1954)
• McClellan v. Chipman · 164 U.S. 347 (1896)
• Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La Cuesta · 458 U.S. 141 (1982)

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)

Explore from here

Brett M. Kavanaugh’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).