Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue Service
Decided November 10, 1987. William Hubbs Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 86-472 · 484 U.S. 9 (1987) · Cited 202 times
Holding
The Haskell Amendment does not exempt from 6103(b)(2)'s definition of confidential "return information" material in IRS files which can be redacted to delete those parts which would identify a particular taxpayer.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 6–0.
Majority · 6
- William Hubbs Rehnquist · delivered the opinion of the Court
- Byron Raymond White
- Harry Andrew Blackmun
- John Paul Stevens
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Thurgood Marshall
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh · 543 U.S. 50 (2004)
Official text
Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)
Explore from here
William Hubbs Rehnquist’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (1987). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).