Gonzalez v. Trevino

Decided June 20, 2024. The Court ruled per curiam — an unsigned opinion of the Court.

Docket 22-1025 · 602 U.S. 653 · Cited 45 times

In requiring petitioner Sylvia Gonzalez to provide specific comparator evidence to support her retaliatory arrest claim, the Fifth Circuit did not properly apply the principles of Nieves v. Bartlett, 587 U. S. 391 (2019).

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov) (opens primary source in a new tab)

All opinions since October Term 2017 · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-02. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).