Supreme Court of the United States / October Term 1978

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Decided February 22, 1979. Potter Stewart delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 77-654 · 440 U.S. 69 (1979) · Cited 102 times

Holding

A buyer who has done no more than accept the lower of two prices competitively offered does not violate 2(f) provided the seller has a meeting-competition defense, and here where Borden had such a defense and thus could not be liable under 2(b) petitioner, who did no more than accept Borden's offer, cannot be liable under 2(f).

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 7–1.

Concurring · 1

Dissenting · 1

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

Potter Stewart’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (1979). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).