Harrow v. Department of Defense
Decided May 16, 2024. Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 23-21 · 601 U.S. 480 (2024) · Cited 47 times
Holding
Title 5 U. S. C. §7703(b)(1)’s 60-day filing deadline for a federal employee to petition the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is not jurisdictional.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 9
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · 546 U.S. 500 (2006)
- Bowles v. Russell · 551 U.S. 205 (2007)
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management · 470 U.S. 768 (1985)
- Kontrick v. Ryan · 540 U.S. 443 (2004)
- Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center · 568 U.S. 145 (2013)
- Lawson v. FMR LLC · 571 U.S. 429 (2014)
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Riley v. Bondi · 606 U.S. 259 (2025)
Official text
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)
Explore from here
Elena Kagan’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).