Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al. v. Alpine Ridge Group et al.
Decided May 3, 1993. Byron Raymond White delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 92-551 · 508 U.S. 10 (1993) · Cited 326 times
Holding
This Court need not consider whether 801 of the Reform Act unconstitutionally abrogated a contract right to unobstructed formula-based rent adjustments, since respondents have no such right.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 9
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Johnson v. United States · 529 U.S. 694 (2000)
Official text
Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)
Explore from here
Byron Raymond White’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (1993). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).