Michael Crosby v. United States

Decided January 13, 1993. Harry Andrew Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 91-6194 · 506 U.S. 255 (1993) · Cited 239 times

Holding

Rule 43 prohibits the trial in absentia of a defendant who is not present at the beginning of trial.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 9–0.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Diaz v. United States · 223 U.S. 442 (1912)
• Hopt v. People of Territory of Utah · 110 U.S. 574 (1884)
• Taylor v. United States · 414 U.S. 17 (1973)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

• United States v. Mezzanatto · 513 U.S. 196 (1995)
• New York v. Hill · 528 U.S. 110 (2000)
• Degen v. United States · 517 U.S. 820 (1996)

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

Harry Andrew Blackmun’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (1993). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).