Supreme Court of the United States / October Term 2023

Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency

Decided June 27, 2024. Neil M. Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 23A349 · 603 U.S. 279 (2024) · Cited 27 times

Precedents cited (10) ↓Cited by (4) ↓

Holding

The enforcement of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Federal Implementation Plan against the applicant States—whose own State Implementation Plans were determined by EPA to be inadequate because they failed to adequately address certain obligations under the Good Neighbor Provision—shall be stayed pending disposition of the applicants’ petition for review in the D. C. Circuit and any petition for writ of certiorari, timely sought.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 5–4.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)

Explore from here

Neil M. Gorsuch’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).