Rutherford v. United States

Decided May 28, 2026. Amy Coney Barrett delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 24-820 · 608 U.S. ___ (2026)

When Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive—as with the change to 18 U. S. C. §924(c)—the resulting sentencing disparity cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason that warrants a sentence reduction under §3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov) (opens primary source in a new tab)

Amy Coney Barrett’s profile · All opinions since October Term 2017 · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2026). Data last verified 2026-07-02. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).