Taylor v. Riojas
Decided November 2, 2020. The Court ruled per curiam, an unsigned opinion of the Court.
Docket 19-1261 · 592 U.S. 7 (2020) · Cited 410 times
Holding
Because any reasonable correctional officer should have realized that inmate Taylor’s conditions of confinement offended the Eighth Amendment, the Fifth Circuit erred in granting the officers qualified immunity.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Hope v. Pelzer · 536 U.S. 730 (2002)
- Brosseau v. Haugen · 543 U.S. 194 (2004)
- Hutto v. Finney · 437 U.S. 678 (1978)
- United States v. Lanier · 520 U.S. 259 (1997)
- Major League Baseball Players Assn. v. Garvey · 532 U.S. 504 (2001)
Official text
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)
Explore from here
All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2020). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).