Whitton v. Dixon

Decided June 1, 2026. The Court ruled per curiam — an unsigned opinion of the Court.

Docket 25-580 · 608 U.S. ___ (2026)

The Court of Appeals erred in considering post-trial DNA evidence when assessing whether the Florida Supreme Court reasonably determined that jailhouse informant Ozio’s testimony was immaterial to the jury’s verdict, because evidence not presented to the jury could not have influenced the jury’s verdict and therefore sheds no light on whether Ozio’s testimony influenced that verdict.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov) (opens primary source in a new tab)

All opinions since October Term 2017 · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2026). Data last verified 2026-07-02. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).