Middle District of North Carolina / Appointed 1980 / Served to 2006

Richard Cannon Erwin

Judge, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina

Appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1980 and confirmed by voice vote, Richard Cannon Erwin was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. He earned a law degree from Howard University School of Law in 1951. Rulings & record ↓ Sources ↓

Lived
1923–2006
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter, 1980
Confirmed
by voice vote
Education
Johnson C. Smith 1947 · Howard Law 1951
Succeeded by
James A. Beaty Jr.

Federal judicial service

YearCourtAppointed byVote
1980Middle District of North CarolinaCarter (D)Voice vote

Party letters show the appointing president’s party, not the judge’s own. A voice vote means the chamber approved aloud. No senator-by-senator tally is recorded.

Confirmation vote

Voice vote

The Senate approved this confirmation aloud, with no senator-by-senator tally recorded. Recorded roll-call votes begin in 1989.

Education

Judicial Record

Caseload & case types

In our data, Erwin was assigned 1,186 district-court cases (1984–2004). Median time from filing to termination: 158 days across 1,186 closed cases.

Contract30%
Prisoner & habeas19%
Other federal statutes12%
Social Security9%
Civil rights8%
Personal-injury torts6%
Other16%

Case assignment is from CourtListener’s PACER-derived docket records: a partial sample, not a complete caseload, reflecting the judge last assigned each case. How we count.

In our data, Erwin authored 50 published opinions for the court (1981–1995). Most cited: Sanders v. Duke University (21 citations).

A selective record from published opinions in the CourtListener corpus, not every ruling; most unpublished district orders are not included. Counts and rankings are objective and recomputable: how we count. We describe the record, not the judge.

Recent & notable rulings

YearCaseCitationCited
1982Sanders v. Duke University538 F. Supp. 114321
1983Stearns v. Genrad, Inc.564 F. Supp. 130917
1987United States v. 30.80 Acres, Bruce Tp., Guilford Cty., Nc665 F. Supp. 42215
1990Wall v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.754 F. Supp. 108414
1983Seawell v. Miller Brewing Co.576 F. Supp. 42414
1992Riley v. Dow Corning Corp.876 F. Supp. 72813
1991Love v. Duke University776 F. Supp. 107013
1991Riley v. Dow Corning Corp.767 F. Supp. 73512
1986Gallagher v. Duke University638 F. Supp. 97910
1986United States v. Hayes633 F. Supp. 118310
1983Felts v. Bishop (In Re Winstead)33 B.R. 40810
1987Pappas v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina653 F. Supp. 6999
1982Jones v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n546 F. Supp. 7629
1995Slaughter v. Life Connection of Ohio907 F. Supp. 9298
1988United States v. Lititz Mutual Insurance694 F. Supp. 1598

Showing the 15 most-cited of 50 authored opinions in our data. “Cited” is inbound citations across the CourtListener corpus. Case links open the ruling’s full text (CourtListener) or its page here; read the methodology and verify against the primary source.

Questions & answers

Who appointed Richard Cannon Erwin?
President Jimmy Carter appointed Richard Cannon Erwin to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in 1980.
Was Richard Cannon Erwin appointed by a Democrat or a Republican?
Richard Cannon Erwin was appointed by President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat. JudicialFinder records the appointing president's party, not a judge's own politics.
What was Richard Cannon Erwin's confirmation vote?
Richard Cannon Erwin was confirmed by voice vote on September 29, 1980. No senator-by-senator tally was recorded.
Which court was Richard Cannon Erwin on?
Richard Cannon Erwin was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Sources

Each fact on this page traces to a primary public record.

How we source & reconcile data → Data & Sources

See something wrong? Report an error. Fixes are logged in the corrections log.

26 years on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Data as of 2026-08-10. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).