Vincent L. Leibell
Appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 and confirmed by voice vote, Vincent L. Leibell was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. He earned a law degree from Fordham University School of Law in 1908. Rulings & record ↓ Sources ↓
- Lived
- 1883–1968
- Appointed by
- Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936
- Confirmed
- by voice vote
- Education
- Fordham Law 1908
- Succeeded
- Francis Asbury Winslow
- Succeeded by
- Alexander Bicks
Federal judicial service
| Year | Court | Appointed by | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1936 | Southern District of New York succeeded Francis Asbury Winslow | F.D. Roosevelt (D) | Voice vote |
Party letters show the appointing president’s party, not the judge’s own. A voice vote means the chamber approved aloud. No senator-by-senator tally is recorded.
Confirmation vote
Voice vote
The Senate approved this confirmation aloud, with no senator-by-senator tally recorded. Recorded roll-call votes begin in 1989.
Education
| St. Francis Xavier College | M.A. | 1905 |
| Fordham University School of Law | LL.B. | 1908 |
Judicial Record
In our data, Leibell authored 125 published opinions for the court (1936–1964). Most cited: Osborne v. Mallory (63 citations).
A selective record from published opinions in the CourtListener corpus, not every ruling; most unpublished district orders are not included. Counts and rankings are objective and recomputable: how we count. We describe the record, not the judge.
Recent & notable rulings
| Year | Case | Citation | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1949 | Osborne v. Mallory | 86 F. Supp. 869 | 63 |
| 1948 | Alden-Rochelle, Inc. v. American Soc. of Composers, Authors & Publishers | 80 F. Supp. 888 | 54 |
| 1942 | Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation | 44 F. Supp. 960 | 49 |
| 1942 | Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation | 48 F. Supp. 490 | 47 |
| 1940 | Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists Corporation | 35 F. Supp. 633 | 46 |
| 1937 | Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc. | 20 F. Supp. 369 | 41 |
| 1940 | Munzer v. Swedish American Line | 35 F. Supp. 493 | 36 |
| 1945 | Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Co. v. Brown | 64 F. Supp. 168 | 35 |
| 1946 | San Carlo Opera Co. v. Conley | 72 F. Supp. 825 | 34 |
| 1952 | Komlos v. Compagnie Nationale Air France | 111 F. Supp. 393 | 31 |
| 1949 | Middle East Agency v. the John B. Waterman | 86 F. Supp. 487 | 31 |
| 1937 | The Grasselli Chemical Co. No. 4. | 20 F. Supp. 394 | 29 |
| 1947 | In Re Raabe, Glissman & Co. | 71 F. Supp. 678 | 28 |
| 1939 | Bough v. Lee | 28 F. Supp. 673 | 27 |
| 1954 | Wolf v. Aero Factors Corporation | 126 F. Supp. 872 | 26 |
Showing the 15 most-cited of 125 authored opinions in our data. “Cited” is inbound citations across the CourtListener corpus. Case links open the ruling’s full text (CourtListener) or its page here; read the methodology and verify against the primary source.
Questions & answers
- Who appointed Vincent L. Leibell?
- President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Vincent L. Leibell to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1936.
- Was Vincent L. Leibell appointed by a Democrat or a Republican?
- Vincent L. Leibell was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat. JudicialFinder records the appointing president's party, not a judge's own politics.
- What was Vincent L. Leibell's confirmation vote?
- Vincent L. Leibell was confirmed by voice vote on June 16, 1936. No senator-by-senator tally was recorded.
- Which court was Vincent L. Leibell on?
- Vincent L. Leibell was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Sources
Each fact on this page traces to a primary public record.
- FJC Biographical Directory
- Wikidata
- CourtListener bulk data (Free Law Project): authored opinions & citation counts
How we source & reconcile data → Data & Sources
See something wrong? Report an error. Fixes are logged in the corrections log.
32 years on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Data as of 2026-08-10. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).