City and County of San Francisco v. EPA
Decided March 4, 2025. Samuel A. Alito Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 23-753 · 604 U.S. 334 · Cited 13 times
The challenged end-result permitting provisions—which make the permittee responsible for the quality of the water in the body of water into which the permittee discharges pollutants—exceed the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority under the Clean Water Act.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov) (opens primary source in a new tab)
Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s profile · All opinions since October Term 2017 · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2025). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-02. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).