Supreme Court of the United States / October Term 2020

Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.

Decided March 25, 2021. Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 19-368 · 592 U.S. 351 (2021) · Cited 1,735 times

Precedents cited (21) ↓Cited by (1) ↓

Holding

The connection between plaintiffs’ product-liability claims arising from car accidents occurring in each plaintiff’s State of residence and Ford’s activities in those States is sufficient to support specific jurisdiction in the respective State courts even though the automobiles involved in the accidents were manufactured and sold elsewhere.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 8–0.

Concurring · 3

Did not participate · 1

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)

Explore from here

Elena Kagan’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2021). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).