Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.

Decided May 24, 1965. Tom C. Clark delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 291 · 381 U.S. 311 (1965) · Cited 138 times

We don’t yet publish a summary of this opinion — read the official text below for the Court’s holding and reasoning.

How the Justices voted

Decided 5–2.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · 380 U.S. 424 (1965)
• Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp. · 340 U.S. 558 (1951)
• Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. · 346 U.S. 537 (1954)
• United States v. Columbia Steel Co. · 334 U.S. 495 (1948)
• Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co. · 330 U.S. 743 (1947)
• United States v. Welden · 377 U.S. 95 (1964)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

• Greyhound Corp. v. Mt. Hood Stages, Inc. · 437 U.S. 322 (1978)
• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · 401 U.S. 321 (1971)
• Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · 431 U.S. 720 (1977)
• California v. American Stores Co. · 495 U.S. 271 (1990)

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

Tom C. Clark’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: the U.S. Reports via govinfo.gov; authoring Justice and vote lineup from the Supreme Court Database (Washington University). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).