Siegel v. Fitzgerald
Decided June 6, 2022. Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 21-441 · 596 U.S. 464 (2022) · Cited 32 times
Holding
Congress’ enactment of a significant fee increase that exempted debtors in two States violated the uniformity requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 9
- John G. Roberts, Jr.
- Clarence Thomas
- Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
- Sonia Sotomayor · delivered the opinion of the Court
- Elena Kagan
- Neil M. Gorsuch
- Brett M. Kavanaugh
- Amy Coney Barrett
- Stephen G. Breyer
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases · 419 U.S. 102 (1974)
- Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons · 455 U.S. 457 (1982)
- Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance · 304 U.S. 502 (1938)
- Cutter v. Wilkinson · 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · 200 U.S. 321 (1906)
Official text
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)
Explore from here
Sonia Sotomayor’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2022). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).