Teitel Film Corp. et al. v. Cusack et al., Members of the Motion Picture Appeal Board of the City of Chicago

Decided January 29, 1968. The Court ruled per curiam — an unsigned opinion of the Court.

Docket 787 · 390 U.S. 139 (1968) · Cited 138 times

We don’t yet publish a summary of this opinion — read the official text below for the Court’s holding and reasoning.

How the Justices voted

Decided 9–0.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Freedman v. Maryland · 380 U.S. 51 (1965)
• Redrup v. New York · 386 U.S. 767 (1967)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

• United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs · 402 U.S. 363 (1971)
• FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas · 493 U.S. 215 (1990)
• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton · 413 U.S. 49 (1973)
• Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad · 420 U.S. 546 (1975)
• Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co. · 467 U.S. 947 (1984)
• Heller v. New York · 413 U.S. 483 (1973)
• Byrne v. Karalexis · 401 U.S. 216 (1971)

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: the U.S. Reports via govinfo.gov; authoring Justice and vote lineup from the Supreme Court Database (Washington University). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).