Thornell v. Jones

Decided May 30, 2024. Samuel A. Alito Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 22-982 · 602 U.S. 154 (2024) · Cited 26 times

Holding

The Ninth Circuit’s grant of habeas relief on Jones’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was based on an erroneous interpretation and application of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 6–3.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Strickland v. Washington · 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
• Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · 539 U.S. 510 (2003)
• Cullen v. Pinholster · 563 U.S. 170 (2011)
• Eddings v. Oklahoma · 455 U.S. 104 (1982)
• Porter v. McCollum · 558 U.S. 30 (2009)
• Wong v. Belmontes · 558 U.S. 15 (2009)
• Williams v. Taylor · 529 U.S. 362 (2000)
• Rompilla v. Beard · 545 U.S. 374 (2005)
• Cutter v. Wilkinson · 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
• United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · 200 U.S. 321 (1906)
• CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n · 578 U.S. 419 (2016)

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)

Explore from here

Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).