Ronald Rompilla v. Jeffrey a. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Decided June 20, 2005. David Hackett Souter delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 04-5462 · 545 U.S. 374 (2005) · Cited 1,891 times
Holding
Even when a capital defendant and his family members have suggested that no mitigating evidence is available, his lawyer is bound to make reasonable efforts to obtain and review material that counsel knows the prosecution will probably rely on as evidence of aggravation at the trial’s sentencing phase.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 5–4.
Majority · 4
- David Hackett Souter · delivered the opinion of the Court
- John Paul Stevens
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Stephen Gerald Breyer
Concurring · 1
- Sandra Day O'Connor · filed a concurring opinion
Dissenting · 4
- Anthony McLeod Kennedy · filed a dissenting opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Clarence Thomas
- William Hubbs Rehnquist
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Strickland v. Washington · 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
- Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · 539 U.S. 510 (2003)
- Williams v. Taylor · 529 U.S. 362 (2000)
- Roe v. Flores-Ortega · 528 U.S. 470 (2000)
- Burger v. Kemp · 483 U.S. 776 (1987)
- Yarborough v. Gentry · 540 U.S. 1 (2003)
- Simmons v. South Carolina · 512 U.S. 154 (1994)
- Bell v. Cone · 535 U.S. 685 (2002)
- Lockyer v. Andrade · 538 U.S. 63 (2003)
- Woodford v. Visciotti · 537 U.S. 19 (2002)
- Early v. Packer · 537 U.S. 3 (2002)
- Mitchell v. Esparza · 540 U.S. 12 (2003)
- Middleton v. McNeil · 541 U.S. 433 (2004)
- Holland v. Jackson · 542 U.S. 649 (2004)
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Andrus v. Texas · 590 U.S. 806 (2020)
- Schriro v. Landrigan · 550 U.S. 465 (2007)
- White v. Woodall · 572 U.S. 415 (2014)
- Wood v. Allen · 558 U.S. 290 (2010)
- Maryland v. Kulbicki · 577 U.S. 1 (2015)
- Chaidez v. United States · 568 U.S. 342 (2013)
- Porter v. McCollum · 558 U.S. 30 (2009)
- Ayestas v. Davis · 584 U.S. 28 (2018)
- Thornell v. Jones · 602 U.S. 154 (2024)
- Harrington v. Richter · 562 U.S. 86 (2011)
- Wilson v. Sellers · 584 U.S. 122 (2018)
- Cone v. Bell · 556 U.S. 449 (2009)
- Bobby v. Van Hook · 558 U.S. 4 (2009)
- Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon · 548 U.S. 331 (2006)
- Jefferson v. Upton · 560 U.S. 284 (2010)
Official text
Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)
Explore from here
David Hackett Souter’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2005). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).