Murray Irwin Gurfein
Appointed by President Richard M. Nixon in 1974 and confirmed by voice vote, Murray Irwin Gurfein was a Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He earned a law degree from Harvard Law School in 1930. He previously served on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Opinions & record ↓ Sources ↓
- Lived
- 1907–1979
- Appointed by
- Richard M. Nixon, 1974
- Confirmed
- by voice vote
- Education
- Columbia College 1926 · Harvard Law School 1930
- Succeeded
- Paul Raymond Hays
- Succeeded by
- Lawrence Warren Pierce
Federal judicial service
| Year | Court | Appointed by | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | Southern District of New York succeeded Thomas Francis Murphy | Nixon (R) | Voice vote |
| 1974 | Second Circuit succeeded Paul Raymond Hays | Nixon (R) | Voice vote |
Party letters show the appointing president’s party, not the judge’s own. A voice vote means the chamber approved aloud. No senator-by-senator tally is recorded.
Confirmation vote
Voice vote
The Senate approved this confirmation aloud, with no senator-by-senator tally recorded. Recorded roll-call votes begin in 1989.
Education
| Columbia College | A.B. | 1926 |
| Harvard Law School | LL.B. | 1930 |
Judicial Record
In our data, Gurfein authored 106 published opinions for the court (1971–1975). Most cited: Mortellito v. Nina of California, Inc. (62 citations).
Published, precedential opinions from the CourtListener corpus. Counts and rankings are objective and recomputable: how we count. We describe the record, not the judge.
Selected opinions
| Year | Case | Citation | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | Mortellito v. Nina of California, Inc. | 335 F. Supp. 1288 | 62 |
| 1971 | Lawn v. Franklin | 328 F. Supp. 791 | 38 |
| 1974 | Viacom International Inc. v. Tandem Productions, Inc. | 368 F. Supp. 1264 | 29 |
| 1973 | In Re Freudmann | 362 F. Supp. 429 | 29 |
| 1971 | American Cyanamid Co. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. | 331 F. Supp. 597 | 29 |
| 1971 | Bowman v. Hartig | 334 F. Supp. 1323 | 28 |
| 1971 | Gaf Corporation v. Circle Floor Co. | 329 F. Supp. 823 | 27 |
| 1973 | Rosette v. Rainbo Record Manufacturing Corporation | 354 F. Supp. 1183 | 26 |
| 1972 | Doe v. Lavine | 347 F. Supp. 357 | 26 |
| 1972 | Plum Tree, Inc. v. NK Winston Corporation | 351 F. Supp. 80 | 25 |
| 1972 | Geo. Washington Mint, Inc. v. Washington Mint, Inc. | 349 F. Supp. 255 | 25 |
| 1973 | Texas Consumer Finance Corp. v. First National City Bank | 365 F. Supp. 427 | 24 |
| 1971 | Weinberger v. New York Stock Exchange | 335 F. Supp. 139 | 24 |
| 1972 | United States v. Local 638, Enterprise Ass'n of Steam | 347 F. Supp. 164 | 23 |
| 1973 | Shapiro v. Ferrandina | 355 F. Supp. 563 | 22 |
Showing the 15 most-cited of 106 authored opinions in our data. “Cited” is inbound citations across the CourtListener corpus. Case links open the ruling’s full text (CourtListener) or its page here; read the methodology and verify against the primary source.
Questions & answers
- Who appointed Murray Irwin Gurfein?
- President Richard M. Nixon appointed Murray Irwin Gurfein to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1974.
- Was Murray Irwin Gurfein appointed by a Democrat or a Republican?
- Murray Irwin Gurfein was appointed by President Richard M. Nixon, a Republican. JudicialFinder records the appointing president's party, not a judge's own politics.
- What was Murray Irwin Gurfein's confirmation vote?
- Murray Irwin Gurfein was confirmed by voice vote on August 22, 1974. No senator-by-senator tally was recorded.
- Which court was Murray Irwin Gurfein on?
- Murray Irwin Gurfein was a Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Sources
Each fact on this page traces to a primary public record.
- FJC Biographical Directory
- Wikidata
- CourtListener bulk data (Free Law Project): authored opinions & citation counts
How we source & reconcile data → Data & Sources
See something wrong? Report an error. Fixes are logged in the corrections log.
5 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Data as of 2026-08-10. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).