
Willis William Ritter
Appointed by President Harry S Truman in 1950 and confirmed by voice vote, Willis William Ritter was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. He earned a law degree from University of Chicago Law School in 1924. Rulings & record ↓ Sources ↓
- Lived
- 1899–1978
- Appointed by
- Harry S Truman, 1950
- Confirmed
- by voice vote
- Education
- University of Utah · University of Chicago Law School 1924
- Succeeded
- Tillman Davis Johnson
- Succeeded by
- Bruce Sterling Jenkins
Federal judicial service
| Year | Court | Appointed by | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | District of Utah succeeded Tillman Davis Johnson | Truman (D) | Voice vote |
Party letters show the appointing president’s party, not the judge’s own. A voice vote means the chamber approved aloud. No senator-by-senator tally is recorded.
Confirmation vote
Voice vote
The Senate approved this confirmation aloud, with no senator-by-senator tally recorded. Recorded roll-call votes begin in 1989.
Education
| University of Utah | A.B. | |
| University of Chicago Law School | LL.B. | 1924 |
| Harvard Law School | S.J.D. | 1940 |
Judicial Record
In our data, Ritter authored 19 published opinions for the court (1950–1975). Most cited: Tidwell v. American Oil Company (55 citations).
A selective record from published opinions in the CourtListener corpus, not every ruling; most unpublished district orders are not included. Counts and rankings are objective and recomputable: how we count. We describe the record, not the judge.
Recent & notable rulings
| Year | Case | Citation | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | Tidwell v. American Oil Company | 332 F. Supp. 424 | 55 |
| 1952 | Ex Parte Sullivan | 107 F. Supp. 514 | 34 |
| 1951 | Christensen v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. | 95 F. Supp. 446 | 25 |
| 1970 | Reynolds v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company | 309 F. Supp. 548 | 23 |
| 1950 | Abegglen v. Burnham | 94 F. Supp. 484 | 19 |
| 1971 | Murray v. United States | 327 F. Supp. 835 | 13 |
| 1950 | North v. United States | 94 F. Supp. 824 | 11 |
| 1972 | Trans-American Collections, Inc. v. Continental Account Servicing House, Inc. | 342 F. Supp. 1303 | 10 |
| 1968 | Platis v. United States | 288 F. Supp. 254 | 9 |
| 1974 | Albright v. Bergendahl | 391 F. Supp. 754 | 7 |
| 1972 | Anderson v. Salt Lake City Corporation | 348 F. Supp. 1170 | 7 |
| 1969 | Petuskey v. Rampton | 307 F. Supp. 235 | 7 |
| 1973 | Friends of the Earth v. Armstrong | 360 F. Supp. 165 | 6 |
| 1954 | Utah Poultry & Farmers Cooperative v. United States | 119 F. Supp. 846 | 5 |
| 1951 | Aboitiz & Co. v. Price | 99 F. Supp. 602 | 5 |
Showing the 15 most-cited of 19 authored opinions in our data. “Cited” is inbound citations across the CourtListener corpus. Case links open the ruling’s full text (CourtListener) or its page here; read the methodology and verify against the primary source.
Questions & answers
- Who appointed Willis William Ritter?
- President Harry S Truman appointed Willis William Ritter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah in 1950.
- Was Willis William Ritter appointed by a Democrat or a Republican?
- Willis William Ritter was appointed by President Harry S Truman, a Democrat. JudicialFinder records the appointing president's party, not a judge's own politics.
- What was Willis William Ritter's confirmation vote?
- Willis William Ritter was confirmed by voice vote on June 29, 1950. No senator-by-senator tally was recorded.
- Which court was Willis William Ritter on?
- Willis William Ritter was a Judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.
Sources
Each fact on this page traces to a primary public record.
- FJC Biographical Directory
- Wikidata
- Portrait: United States Government (Public domain), via Wikimedia Commons
- CourtListener bulk data (Free Law Project): authored opinions & citation counts
How we source & reconcile data → Data & Sources
See something wrong? Report an error. Fixes are logged in the corrections log.
27 years on the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Data as of 2026-08-10. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).