Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department
Decided September 25, 1984. William A. Holohan wrote the opinion for the court.
690 P.2d 38 · Cited 64 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Randall v. Brigham · 74 U.S. 523
- Seibel v. Kemble · 631 P.2d 173
- Ryan v. State · 656 P.2d 597
- Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles · 564 P.2d 1227
- Yamamoto v. Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors · 124 Ariz. 538
- Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department · 142 Ariz. 360
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Lavit v. Superior Court · 839 P.2d 1141
- Burk v. State · 156 P.3d 423
- Adams v. State · 916 P.2d 1156
- DeSilva v. Baker · 96 P.3d 1084
- Sterling v. Bloom · 723 P.2d 755
- McCleaf v. State · 945 P.2d 1298
- Taggart v. State · 822 P.2d 243
- In the Matter of Rachel R. Alexander · 232 Ariz. 1
- Widoff v. Wiens · 45 P.3d 1232
- Griggs v. Oasis Adoption Services, Inc. · 241 Ariz. 71
- Hertog v. City of Seattle · 138 Wash. 2d 265
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle · 979 P.2d 400
- Bishop v. Miche · 137 Wash. 2d 518
- Bishop v. Miche · 973 P.2d 465
- Lamb v. Hopkins · 492 A.2d 1297
- Faile v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice · 566 S.E.2d 536
- Sanchez v. Coxon · 854 P.2d 126
- State, Department of Corrections v. Cowles · 151 P.3d 353
- Saint-Guillen v. United States · 657 F. Supp. 2d 376
- Burnham v. West · 681 F. Supp. 1169
- State v. Okun · 231 Ariz. 462
- Harlow v. Clatterbuck · 339 S.E.2d 181
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. Schwartz · 837 F. Supp. 1024
- Gelatt v. County of Broome, NY · 811 F. Supp. 61
- State v. Lyons · 804 P.2d 744
Explore from here
William A. Holohan’s Judicial Record · Ariz. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).