Andrews v. Williams
Decided November 24, 1998. Roger McMillin wrote the opinion for the court.
723 So. 2d 1175 · Cited 52 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Pass v. Pass · 118 So. 2d 769
- Rainey v. Rainey · 205 So. 2d 514
- Rogers v. Rogers · 662 So. 2d 1111
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Justus v. Justus · 3 So. 3d 141
- Hammers v. Hammers · 890 So. 2d 944
- East v. East · 775 So. 2d 741
- Reynolds v. Reynolds · 755 So. 2d 467
- Dixon v. Dixon · 238 So. 3d 1191
- Rodgers v. Taylor · 755 So. 2d 33
- Amacker v. Amacker · 33 So. 3d 493
- Pace v. Pace · 24 So. 3d 325
- McSwain v. McSwain · 944 So. 2d 47
- Smith v. Smith · 872 So. 2d 74
- Yelverton v. Yelverton · 961 So. 2d 48
- Ferguson v. Lewis · 31 So. 3d 5
- Sullivan v. Sullivan · 942 So. 2d 305
- Ellzey v. White · 922 So. 2d 40
- Crist v. Lawrence · 738 So. 2d 267
- Moody v. Cates · 58 So. 3d 1245
- Holloway v. Mills · 872 So. 2d 754
Explore from here
Roger McMillin’s Judicial Record · Miss. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).