State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

Brown v. Grimes

Decided January 27, 2011. Richard M. Mosk wrote the opinion for the court.

192 Cal. App. 4th 265 · Cited 108 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Precedents cited (25) ↓Cited by (8) ↓

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Ghirardo v. Antonioli · 883 P.2d 960
Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court · 90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 743
Chambers v. Kay · 56 P.3d 645
Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty. · 15 P.3d 1071
Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San Francisco · 782 P.2d 278
Townsend v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. · 879 N.E.2d 893
Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. · 137 P.3d 914
Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp. · 10 Cal. App. 4th 612
Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. Wolf · 84 P.3d 379
Steiner v. Thexton · 226 P.3d 359
Wyler v. Feuer · 85 Cal. App. 3d 392
Jay Bharat Developers, Inc. v. Minidis · 167 Cal. App. 4th 437
Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino · 176 Cal. App. 4th 516
Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc. · 58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 225
Winet v. Price · 4 Cal. App. 4th 1159
Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP · 35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 31
De Burgh v. De Burgh · 250 P.2d 598
SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway · 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 96
Blain v. Doctor's Co. · 222 Cal. App. 3d 1048
O'FLAHERTY v. Belgum · 9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 286
DeGarmo v. Goldman · 19 Cal. 2d 755
McClure v. Donovan · 33 Cal. 2d 717
In Re Marriage of Fellows · 138 P.3d 200
Bradley Co. v. Bradley · 131 P. 750
Walsh v. West Valley Mission Cmty. Coll. Dist. · 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 725

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Jaramillo v. County of Orange · 200 Cal. App. 4th 811
Plotnik v. Meihaus · 208 Cal. App. 4th 1590
Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc. · 229 Cal. App. 4th 635
Andre Flowers v. Dancy · 205 Cal. App. 4th 1238
Boston LLC v. Juarez · 245 Cal. App. 4th 75
Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc. · 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256
Scott v. Ford Motor Co. · 224 Cal. App. 4th 1492
PROMEX, LLC v. Hernandez · 781 F. Supp. 2d 1013

Explore from here

Richard M. Mosk’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).