State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

CALOROSO v. Hathaway

Decided September 28, 2004. Elizabeth Annette Grimes wrote the opinion for the court.

19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 254 · Cited 50 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Fielder v. City of Glendale · 71 Cal. App. 3d 719
Ursino v. Big Boy Restaurants of America · 192 Cal. App. 3d 394
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. · 24 P.3d 493
Johnson v. City of Palo Alto · 199 Cal. App. 2d 148
Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc. · 8 P.3d 1089
Barrett v. City of Claremont · 41 Cal. 2d 70
Whiting v. City of National City · 9 Cal. 2d 163
Davis v. City of Pasadena · 42 Cal. App. 4th 701
Westbrooks v. State of California · 173 Cal. App. 3d 1203

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Kasparian v. Avalonbay Communities, Inc. · 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885
Huckey v. City of Temecula · 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 336
Stathoulis v. City of Montebello · 164 Cal. App. 4th 559
Cadam v. Somerset Gardens Townhouse HOA · 200 Cal. App. 4th 383
Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc. · 71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 361
People v. Bradley · 208 Cal. App. 4th 64
Jones v. PS Development Co., Inc. · 166 Cal. App. 4th 707

Explore from here

Elizabeth Annette Grimes’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).