State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

Chaker v. Mateo

Decided October 4, 2012. Patricia D. Benke wrote the opinion for the court.

209 Cal. App. 4th 1138 · Cited 62 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Precedents cited (9) ↓Cited by (3) ↓

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Summit Bank v. Rogers · 206 Cal. App. 4th 669
Wilbanks v. Wolk · 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 497
Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher Organization · 203 Cal. App. 4th 450
Krinsky v. Doe 6 · 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 231
Terry v. DAVIS COMMUNITY CHURCH · 33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 145
Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. · 552 P.2d 425
Kashian v. Harriman · 120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 576
Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc. · 10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 429
Global Telemedia Intern., Inc. v. Doe 1 · 132 F. Supp. 2d 1261

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

ZL Techs., Inc. v. Doe · 220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 569
Bently Reserve LP v. Papaliolios · 218 Cal. App. 4th 418
Workman v. Colichman · 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 636

Explore from here

Patricia D. Benke’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).