Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Duran

Decided July 22, 1913. Ben T. Williams wrote the opinion for the court.

134 P. 876 · Cited 62 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntire · 119 P. 1008
• Coker v. Wabash Railroad · 183 Ill. 223
• Means v. Southern California Railway Co. · 77 P. 1001
• Coalgate Co. v. Hurst · 107 P. 657
• Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Blunt · 132 P. 659
• Hughes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. · 130 P. 591
• Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Beatty · 116 P. 171
• Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pribyl · 134 P. 71

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Brazzell · 138 P. 794
• Bison Transports, Inc. v. Fraley · 238 P.2d 835
• Evans v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. · 258 P.2d 933
• Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith · 203 P. 207

Explore from here

Ben T. Williams’s Judicial Record · Okla. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).