County of Orange v. Smith
Decided September 28, 2005. Eileen C. Moore wrote the opinion for the court.
34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 383 · Cited 59 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Loh v. Loh · 93 Cal. App. 4th 325
- In Re Marriage of Bonds · 5 P.3d 815
- Del Real v. City of Riverside · 115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 705
- McComber v. Wells · 85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 376
- In Re the Marriage of Smith · 225 Cal. App. 3d 469
- Nelson v. Gaunt · 125 Cal. App. 3d 623
- Gamet v. Blanchard · 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 439
- Akins v. State of California · 61 Cal. App. 4th 1
- Schubert v. Reynolds · 115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 285
- Vallely Investments, L.P. v. BancAmerica Commercial Corp. · 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 689
- Coy v. County of Los Angeles · 235 Cal. App. 3d 1077
- Scheppers v. Scheppers · 86 Cal. App. 4th 646
- County of Yolo v. Worrell · 208 Cal. App. 3d 471
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Tanguilig v. Valdez · 248 Cal. Rptr. 3d 672
- Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc. · 229 Cal. App. 4th 635
- Burnete v. La Casa Dana Apartments · 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 437
- A.G. v. C.S. · 246 Cal. App. 4th 1269
- In Re Conservatorship Hume · 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 906
- The Termo Company v. Luther · 169 Cal. App. 4th 394
- Hayes v. Temecula Valley Unified Sch. Dist. · 230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 576
- Williams v. Hume · 140 Cal. App. 4th 1385
Explore from here
Eileen C. Moore’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).