U.S. District Court / D. New Jersey

Crowley v. Chait

Decided March 16, 2004. Harold Arnold Ackerman wrote the opinion for the court.

322 F. Supp. 2d 530 · Cited 70 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Voilas v. General Motors Corp. · 73 F. Supp. 2d 452
ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell Advanced Services, Inc. · 171 F. Supp. 2d 473
Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology · 752 F. Supp. 181
Magistrini v. One Hour Martinizing Dry Cleaning · 180 F. Supp. 2d 584

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc. · 627 F. Supp. 2d 384
Suter v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America · 424 F. Supp. 2d 781
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc. · 613 F. Supp. 2d 518
Lyman v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. · 580 F. Supp. 2d 719
Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC. · 742 F. Supp. 2d 182
Feit v. Great-West Life and Annuity Ins. Co. · 460 F. Supp. 2d 632
Viking Yacht Co. v. COMPOSITES ONE LLC · 613 F. Supp. 2d 637
Bereal v. Bajaj · 52 Kan. App. 2d 574
United States v. Philip Morris USA

Explore from here

Harold Arnold Ackerman’s Judicial Record · D. New Jersey · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).