Deaton v. Rush

Decided June 30, 1923. Robert W. Hamilton wrote the opinion for the court.

252 S.W. 1025 · Cited 123 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Tarkington v. Purvis · 128 Ind. 182

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Friend v. McComb · 87 S.W.2d 767
• Nobles v. Marcus · 533 S.W.2d 923
• Hamilton v. Hamilton · 280 S.W.2d 588
• Linkenhoger v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. · 260 S.W.2d 884
• Williams v. Pure Oil Co. · 124 Tex. 341
• Moore v. City of Beaumont · 195 S.W.2d 968
• La Fleaur v. Kinard · 161 S.W.2d 144
• Angelina County v. Bond · 16 S.W.2d 338
• Marshburn v. Stewart · 295 S.W. 679
• S.W. Lumber Co. of New Jersey v. Evans · 275 S.W. 1078
• Free v. Owen · 113 S.W.2d 1221
• Alvis v. McDonald · 282 S.W.2d 425
• Jasper State Bank v. Braswell · 107 S.W.2d 681
• Jefferson County Drainage Dist. No. 6 v. Langham · 81 S.W.2d 747
• Binford v. Snyder · 189 S.W.2d 471
• Lee v. Kirby · 277 S.W. 225

Explore from here

Robert W. Hamilton’s Judicial Record · Tex. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).