State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly

Decided August 31, 2009. Laurence David Rubin wrote the opinion for the court.

177 Cal. App. 4th 209 · Cited 117 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc. · 14 Cal. 4th 434
Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Superior Court · 5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 154
International Shoe Co. v. Washington · 326 U.S. 310
Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto · 69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365
Brown v. Watson · 207 Cal. App. 3d 1306
Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co. · 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 265
In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & II · 135 Cal. App. 4th 100
In Re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II · 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 258

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Pope v. Babick · 229 Cal. App. 4th 1238
Mendoza v. City of West Covina · 206 Cal. App. 4th 702

Explore from here

Laurence David Rubin’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).