Ex Parte City of Tuskegee
Decided December 30, 2005. Tom Woodall wrote the opinion for the court.
932 So. 2d 895 · Cited 65 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Ex Parte Cranman · 792 So. 2d 392
- Swan v. City of Hueytown · 920 So. 2d 1075
- City of Bayou La Batre v. Robinson · 785 So. 2d 1128
- Ex Parte Butts · 775 So. 2d 173
- Howard v. City of Atmore · 887 So. 2d 201
- Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Mental Health · 837 So. 2d 808
- Ex Parte City of Montgomery · 758 So. 2d 565
- Borders v. City of Huntsville · 875 So. 2d 1168
- Jackson v. City of Florence · 320 So. 2d 68
- Hollis v. City of Brighton · 885 So. 2d 135
- Patton v. Black · 646 So. 2d 8
- Ex Parte City of Gadsden · 718 So. 2d 716
- Ex Parte Rizk · 791 So. 2d 911
- Ex Parte McInnis · 820 So. 2d 795
- Ex Parte Tuscaloosa County · 796 So. 2d 1100
- Couch v. City of Sheffield · 708 So. 2d 144
- Ryan v. Hayes · 831 So. 2d 21
- City of Birmingham v. Sutherland · 834 So. 2d 755
- Ex Parte City of Gadsden · 781 So. 2d 936
- Norris v. City of Montgomery · 821 So. 2d 149
- Montgomery v. City of Montgomery · 732 So. 2d 305
- Gary v. Crouch · 867 So. 2d 310
- Ex Parte Puccio · 923 So. 2d 1069
- Williams v. Crook · 741 So. 2d 1074
- Walker v. Briley · 140 F. Supp. 2d 1249
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Newton County v. State ex rel. Dukes · 133 So. 3d 819
- Suttles v. Roy · 75 So. 3d 90
- Ex parte Harris · 216 So. 3d 1201
- Downing v. City of Dothan · 59 So. 3d 16
- Walker v. City of Huntsville · 62 So. 3d 474
- Ex Parte Atchley · 936 So. 2d 513
- Sanders v. Alabama Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation · 937 So. 2d 1018
- Berry v. City of Montgomery · 99 So. 3d 282
- Ex Parte East Alabama Mental Health · 939 So. 2d 1
- Frost v. Dangerfield · 49 So. 3d 675
- Miller v. City of Birmingham · 235 So. 3d 220
- Whatley v. Higginbotham · 145 So. 3d 751
- Ex Parte Woods · 941 So. 2d 259
- Ex Parte Walley · 950 So. 2d 1172
- Pettaway v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (Ex parte City of Selma) · 249 So. 3d 494
- Knight v. Pugh · 801 F. Supp. 2d 1235
- Ex Parte Alabama Dmhmr · 937 So. 2d 1018
- Frank v. Shavers (In re City of Montgomery) · 272 So. 3d 155
- Frank v. Shavers (In re City of Montgomery) · 272 So. 3d 155
- Johnson-Price v. Walley · 950 So. 2d 1172
- Ex parte City of Montgomery and Shelton Davis PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Madilyn Shuford v. City of Montgomery and Shelton Davis) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-900862).
Explore from here
Tom Woodall’s Judicial Record · Ala. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).