Garratt v. Dailey

Decided February 14, 1955. Matthew W. Hill wrote the opinion for the court.

279 P.2d 1091 · Cited 51 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. · 180 Wash. 2d 481
• Sutton v. Tacoma School District No. 10 · 180 Wash. App. 859
• Price v. Kitsap Transit · 886 P.2d 556
• Garratt v. Dailey · 304 P.2d 681
• Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. · 709 P.2d 782
• Horton v. Reaves · 526 P.2d 304
• Griffin v. George's, Inc. · 589 S.W.2d 24
• Bundrick v. Stewart · 128 Wash. App. 11
• Bundrick v. Stewart · 114 P.3d 1204
• DeLuca v. Bowden · 42 Ohio St. 2d 392
• Taneff v. Hoehn (In Re Taneff) · 190 B.R. 501
• Kelly v. Kelly · 228 N.W.2d 332
• Van Camp v. McAfoos · 156 N.W.2d 878
• Esborg v. Bailey Drug Co. · 378 P.2d 298
• Braswell v. N. C. a & T State University · 168 S.E.2d 24
• Ghassemieh v. Schafer · 52 Md. App. 31
• Bowser v. Jacobs · 194 N.W.2d 110
• Peterson v. Neal · 292 P.2d 358
• Brear v. Washington State Highway Commission · 389 P.2d 276

Explore from here

Matthew W. Hill’s Judicial Record · Wash. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).