Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Decided January 12, 2005. Carlos R. Moreno wrote the opinion for the court.

101 P.3d 140 · Cited 279 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Ketchum v. Moses · 17 P.3d 735
• Westside Community for Independent Living, Inc. v. Obledo · 657 P.2d 365
• Serrano v. Priest · 569 P.2d 1303
• Beasley v. Wells Fargo Bank · 235 Cal. App. 3d 1407
• Downey Cares v. Downey Community Development Commission · 196 Cal. App. 3d 983
• Maria P. v. Riles · 743 P.2d 932
• Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of Governments · 652 P.2d 437
• In Re Head · 721 P.2d 65
• Tipton-Whittingham v. City of Los Angeles · 101 P.3d 174
• Grimsley v. Board of Supervisors · 169 Cal. App. 3d 960
• Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc. · 266 Cal. App. 2d 313
• Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission · 743 P.2d 1323
• Trope v. Katz · 902 P.2d 259
• Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los Angeles · 593 P.2d 200
• Serrano v. Unruh · 652 P.2d 985
• Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc. · 667 P.2d 704
• Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · 15 Cal. 4th 288
• Flannery v. Prentice · 28 P.3d 860
• Lennane v. Franchise Tax Board · 885 P.2d 976
• County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court · 532 P.2d 495
• Belth v. Garamendi · 232 Cal. App. 3d 896
• Susan Northington v. Davis · 593 P.2d 221
• Baksinski v. Northwestern University · 595 N.E.2d 1106
• Edgerton v. State Personnel Board · 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 491
• Flannery v. California Highway Patrol · 61 Cal. App. 4th 629

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Chin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. · 520 F. Supp. 2d 589
• Vasquez v. State · 45 Cal. 4th 243
• Vasquez v. California · 45 Cal. 4th 243
• Enpalm, Lcc v. Teitler Family Trust · 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 902
• Chin v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. · 461 F. Supp. 2d 279
• Godinez v. Schwarzenegger · 132 Cal. App. 4th 73
• Cates v. Chiang · 213 Cal. App. 4th 791
• La Mirada Ave. Neighborhood Ass'n of Hollywood v. City of L. A. · 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 338
• Doran v. Del Taco, Inc. · 373 F. Supp. 2d 1028
• Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan v. Oakley, Inc. · 180 Cal. App. 4th 1542
• Abouab v. City and County of San Francisco · 46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 206
• Carian v. Cal. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife CA4/1 · 235 Cal. App. 4th 806
• Environmental Protection Information Center v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection · 190 Cal. App. 4th 217
• Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist. · 249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 309
• People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC · 231 Cal. Rptr. 3d 595
• 569 E. Cnty. Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc. · 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 324
• County of Colusa v. California Wildlife Conservation Board · 52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
• Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Mrs. Gooch's Natural Food Markets, Inc. · 25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 514
• Mundy v. Neal · 186 Cal. App. 4th 256
• Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal Commission · 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 32
• Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast Region · 183 Cal. App. 4th 330
• Vasquez v. State · 65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 73
• 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc. · 6 Cal. App. 5th 426
• Lyons v. Chinese Hospital Ass'n · 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 550
• McGuigan v. City of San Diego · 183 Cal. App. 4th 610

Explore from here

Carlos R. Moreno’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).