Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500
Decided March 14, 1917. Frederick W. Henshaw wrote the opinion for the court.
163 P. 1024 · Cited 113 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108 · 73 Cal. 125
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Tranbarger · 238 U.S. 67
- Jackson v. United States · 230 U.S. 1
- McDaniel v. Cummings · 83 Cal. 515
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108 · 111 U.S. 701
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co. · 99 P. 502
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist. · 103 P. 207
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior Court · 154 P. 845
- Green v. Swift · 47 Cal. 536
- People Ex Rel. Robarts v. Russ · 64 P. 111
- Hadacheck v. Sebastian · 239 U.S. 394
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co. · 80 U.S. 166
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co. · 229 U.S. 53
- Buttfield v. Stranahan · 192 U.S. 470
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. · 174 U.S. 690
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury · 151 P. 398
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. Pillsbury · 156 P. 491
- Reardon v. City of San Francisco · 66 Cal. 492
- Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. Briggs · 229 U.S. 82
- Great Western Power Co. v. Pillsbury · 149 P. 35
- Marchant v. Pennsylyania Railroad · 153 U.S. 380
- Ex Parte Hadacheck · 132 P. 584
- Gross v. United States Mortgage Co. · 108 U.S. 477
- Martin v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie Railroad · 203 U.S. 284
- Hagar v. Board of Supervisors · 47 Cal. 222
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Beckley v. Reclamation Board · 205 Cal. App. 2d 734
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. · 67 Cal. 2d 408
- Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Halman · 262 Cal. App. 2d 510
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. · 432 P.2d 3
- Archer v. City of Los Angeles · 19 Cal. 2d 19
- Clement v. State Reclamation Board · 220 P.2d 897
- Locklin v. City of Lafayette · 867 P.2d 724
- Customer Co. v. City of Sacramento · 895 P.2d 900
- Holtz v. Superior Court · 475 P.2d 441
- Heller v. Fire Insurance Exchange · 800 P.2d 1006
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon) · 625 P.2d 239
- Kleaving v. Board of Directors of Middlefork Watershed Conservancy District · 508 N.E.2d 574
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Railroad Commission · 229 P. 949
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist. · 187 P. 1041
- Sheffet v. County of Los Angeles · 3 Cal. App. 3d 720
- In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6 · 218 P. 27
- Paterno v. State · 6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 854
- State v. Bonelli Cattle Company · 489 P.2d 699
- Piper v. Hawley · 175 P. 417
- People v. Rhoades · 12 Cal. App. 3d 720
- Morshead v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board · 45 Cal. App. 3d 442
- Rose v. State of California · 19 Cal. 2d 713
- Paterno v. State · 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 754
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control District · 764 P.2d 1070
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of Yuba · 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 436
Explore from here
Frederick W. Henshaw’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).