Hoverson v. Hoverson

Decided July 10, 2001. William A. Neumann wrote the opinion for the court.

2001 ND 124 · Cited 55 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Peterson v. Peterson · 1999 ND 191
• Theis v. Theis · 534 N.W.2d 26
• Linrud v. Linrud · 552 N.W.2d 342
• Johnson v. Johnson · 2000 ND 170
• Ruff v. Ruff · 52 N.W.2d 107
• Kautzman v. Kautzman · 1998 ND 192
• Weigel v. Weigel · 2000 ND 16
• Schiff v. Schiff · 2000 ND 113
• Mellum v. Mellum · 2000 ND 47
• Young v. Young · 1998 ND 83
• Barth v. Barth · 1999 ND 91
• Emter v. Emter · 1999 ND 102
• Fischer v. Fischer · 139 N.W.2d 845
• Heggen v. Heggen · 452 N.W.2d 96
• Richter v. Houser · 598 N.W.2d 193
• Schleicher v. Schleicher · 551 N.W.2d 766

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Heinz v. Heinz · 2001 ND 147
• Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh · 2004 ND 11
• Olson v. Olson · 2002 ND 30
• Swanson v. Swanson · 2019 ND 25
• Lee v. Lee · 927 N.W.2d 104
• Evenson v. Evenson · 2007 ND 194
• Swanson v. Swanson · 2019 ND 25
• Swanson v. Swanson · 2019 ND 25
• Hitz v. Hitz · 2008 ND 58
• Hoverson v. Hoverson · 828 N.W.2d 510
• Kostelecky v. Kostelecky · 2006 ND 120
• Schultz v. Schultz · 2018 ND 259
• Weigel v. Weigel · 871 N.W.2d 810
• Boehm v. Boehm · 2002 ND 144
• Sommers v. Sommers · 2003 ND 77
• Stoppler v. Stoppler · 2001 ND 148
• McDowell v. McDowell · 2001 ND 176
• Horner v. Horner · 2004 ND 165
• Korynta v. Korynta · 2006 ND 17
• Holden v. Holden · 2007 ND 29
• Dufner v. Dufner · 2002 ND 47
• Schrodt v. Schrodt · 971 N.W.2d 861
• Conzemius v. Conzemius · 2014 ND 5
• Gershman v. Gershman · 943 A.2d 1091
• Walstad v. Walstad · 821 N.W.2d 770

Explore from here

William A. Neumann’s Judicial Record · N.D. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).