In Re REISMAN ESTATE
Decided August 3, 2005. Michael R. Smolenski wrote the opinion for the court.
702 N.W.2d 658 · Cited 81 times
Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- MacOmb County Prosecutor v. Murphy · 627 N.W.2d 247
- Mitcham v. City of Detroit · 94 N.W.2d 388
- In Re Maloney Trust · 377 N.W.2d 791
- In Re Woodworth Trust · 492 N.W.2d 818
- In Re Dodge Trust · 330 N.W.2d 72
- In Re Allen Estate · 388 N.W.2d 705
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- In Re RAYMOND ESTATE · 739 N.W.2d 889
- Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose Township · 761 N.W.2d 293
- In re Estate of Stan · 301 Mich. App. 435
- in Re Mardigian Estate · 312 Mich. App. 553
- In re Theodora Nickels Herbert Trust · 303 Mich. App. 456
- Wicklund v. Wicklund · 812 N.W.2d 359
- In Re MARY E GRIFFIN REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST · 760 N.W.2d 318
Explore from here
Michael R. Smolenski’s Judicial Record · Mich. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).