In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & Nomberg

Decided March 27, 1979. Matthew Joseph Jasen wrote the opinion for the court.

46 N.Y.2d 623 · Cited 294 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc. · 40 N.Y.2d 354
• Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. Weitz · 13 N.Y.2d 267
• Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. Strauman · 40 N.Y.2d 303
• Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp. · 42 N.Y.2d 496
• Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc. v. Board of Education · 33 N.Y.2d 229
• In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & Lewis · 40 N.Y.2d 687
• Rokowsky v. Finance Administrator · 41 N.Y.2d 574
• Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'n · 40 N.Y.2d 774
• Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. Winsor · 87 U.S. 64
• Lentine v. Fundaro · 29 N.Y.2d 382
• In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc. · 21 N.Y.2d 621
• Board of Education v. Areman · 41 N.Y.2d 527
• In re the Arbitration between Raisler Corp. & New York City Housing Authority · 32 N.Y.2d 274
• Meacham v. Jamestown, Franklin & Clearfield Railroad · 105 N.E. 653
• In Re the Arbitration Between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & Holz · 4 N.Y.2d 245
• In re the Arbitration between Candor Central School District & Candor Teachers Ass'n · 42 N.Y.2d 266
• Durst v. Abrash · 22 A.D.2d 39

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. Straus · 897 F. Supp. 805
• Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp. · 805 F. Supp. 1157
• New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 · 99 N.Y.2d 1
• Yonir Technologies, Inc. v. DURATION SYSTEMS (1992) LTD. · 244 F. Supp. 2d 195
• Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans · 988 P.2d 67
• Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd. · 907 F. Supp. 547
• Hough v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · 757 F. Supp. 283
• Klein Sleep Products, Inc. v. Hillside Bedding Co. · 563 F. Supp. 904
• In re the Arbitration between State of New York & Civil Service Employees Ass'n · 79 A.D.3d 1438
• John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Austin · 916 F. Supp. 158
• Stendig International, Inc. v. B. & B. Italia, S.P.A. · 633 F. Supp. 27
• Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy · 654 N.E.2d 95
• County of Chautauqua v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 1000 · 8 N.Y.3d 513
• In re the Arbitration between Blackburne & Governor's Office of Employee Relations · 87 N.Y.2d 660
• In Re the Arbitration Between Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 & Village of Johnson City · 958 N.E.2d 899
• Heslin v. City of Cohoes · 74 A.D.2d 393
• In re the Arbitration between Board of Education & McGinnis · 100 A.D.2d 330
• Norris v. Cooper · 61 N.Y.2d 299
• New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. State · 726 N.E.2d 462
• In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'n · 710 N.E.2d 1064
• Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation Authority · 66 N.Y.2d 341
• Fletcher v. Kidder, Peabody & Co. · 619 N.E.2d 998
• In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna Insurance · 74 A.D.2d 442
• City of New York v. Uniformed Fire Officers Ass'n · 95 N.Y.2d 273
• Greenwich Mills Co. v. Barrie House Coffee Co. · 91 A.D.2d 398

Explore from here

Matthew Joseph Jasen’s Judicial Record · N.Y. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).