In Re the Marriage of Anliker
Decided April 1, 2005. Louis A. Lavorato wrote the opinion for the court.
694 N.W.2d 535 · Cited 77 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- In Re the Marriage of Francis · 442 N.W.2d 59
- In Re the Marriage of Spiegel · 553 N.W.2d 309
- In Re the Marriage Probasco · 676 N.W.2d 179
- In Re the Marriage of Brown · 487 N.W.2d 331
- In Re the Marriage of Ask · 551 N.W.2d 643
- In Re Marriage of McNerney · 417 N.W.2d 205
- In Re the Marriage of Debler · 459 N.W.2d 267
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- In Re the Marriage of Hansen · 733 N.W.2d 683
- In Re the Marriage of Steven Michael Gust and Linda Leann Gust Upon the Petition of Steven Michael Gust · 858 N.W.2d 402
- In Re the Marriage of Rhinehart · 704 N.W.2d 677
- In Re the Marriage of Richard C. Mauer and Carol K. Mauer, Upon the Petition of Richard C. Mauer · 874 N.W.2d 103
- Rojas v. Pine Ridge Farms, L.L.C. · 779 N.W.2d 223
Explore from here
Louis A. Lavorato’s Judicial Record · Iowa · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).