State Court of Appeals / Colo. Ct. App.

In Re the Marriage of Barker

Decided November 24, 2010. Janice B. Davidson wrote the opinion for the court.

251 P.3d 591 · Cited 287 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Griffin v. Griffin · 699 P.2d 407
Mockelmann v. Mockelmann · 121 P.3d 337
In Re Marriage of Rozzi · 190 P.3d 815
In Re the Marriage of Lafaye · 89 P.3d 455
In Re the Marriage of Rodrick · 176 P.3d 806
In Re the Marriage of DePalma · 176 P.3d 829
In Re the Marriage of Elmer · 936 P.2d 617
In Re the Marriage of Meisner · 807 P.2d 1205
People v. Coyle · 654 P.2d 815
In Re the Marriage of Plesich · 881 P.2d 379
In Re the Marriage of Popack · 998 P.2d 464
In Re the Marriage of Chambers · 657 P.2d 458
In re the Marriage of Burke · 39 P.3d 1226

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

In re the Marriage of Leverett · 318 P.3d 31
In re the Marriage of Rivera · 300 P.3d 994
Marriage of Vanderborgh v. Krauth · 370 P.3d 661
In re the Marriage of Paige · 282 P.3d 506

Explore from here

Janice B. Davidson’s Judicial Record · Colo. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).