In Re the Marriage of Ensminger
Decided December 11, 2008. David Jay Richman wrote the opinion for the court.
209 P.3d 1163 · Cited 627 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- In re Marriage of Aldrich · 945 P.2d 1370
- Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American Dream · 187 P.3d 1207
- City of Aurora v. Colorado State Engineer · 105 P.3d 595
- Christensen v. Hoover · 643 P.2d 525
- Kinsey v. Preeson · 746 P.2d 542
- City of Wheat Ridge v. Cerveny · 913 P.2d 1110
- Negron v. Golder · 111 P.3d 538
- Pedlow v. Stamp · 776 P.2d 382
- In Re the Marriage of Atencio · 47 P.3d 718
- Roberts-Henry v. Richter · 802 P.2d 1159
- Sullivan v. Lutz · 827 P.2d 626
- Ochoa v. Vered · 186 P.3d 107
- Anderson Boneless Beef, Inc. v. Sunshine Health Care Center, Inc. · 878 P.2d 98
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- People · 305 P.3d 414
- In re the Marriage of Wiggins · 279 P.3d 1
- Estate of Keenan v. Colorado State Bank · 252 P.3d 539
Explore from here
David Jay Richman’s Judicial Record · Colo. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).