In Re the Marriage of Wells
Decided March 17, 2011. Laurie Ann Booras wrote the opinion for the court.
252 P.3d 1212 · Cited 690 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- In the Marriage of Quam · 813 P.2d 833
- In Re the Marriage of Atencio · 47 P.3d 718
- Soulsby v. Soulsby · 664 S.E.2d 121
- People v. Milton · 732 P.2d 1199
- In Re Marriage of West · 94 P.3d 1248
- In Re the Marriage of Dunkle · 194 P.3d 462
- In Re the Marriage of Emerson · 77 P.3d 923
- Combs v. Tibbitts · 148 P.3d 430
- Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc. · 832 P.2d 718
- Christensen v. Hoover · 643 P.2d 525
- O'CONNELL v. Biomet, Inc. · 250 P.3d 1278
- In Re the Marriage of Blanford · 937 N.E.2d 356
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Mitton v. Mitton · 242 Ariz. 201
- In re the Marriage of Roddy · 338 P.3d 1070
- Mountain States Adjustment v. Cooke · 412 P.3d 819
- Cikraji v. Snowberger · 410 P.3d 573
- Foster v. Plock · 411 P.3d 1008
Explore from here
Laurie Ann Booras’s Judicial Record · Colo. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).