In re the Welfare of X.T.
Decided March 5, 2013. Joel Penoyar wrote the opinion for the court.
174 Wash. App. 733 · Cited 53 times
Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Schermer v. Department of Social & Health Services · 161 Wash. 2d 927
- D.P. v. Department of Social & Health Services · 882 P.2d 1180
- In Re Welfare of Sego · 513 P.2d 831
- State v. Bourgeois · 133 Wash. 2d 389
- State v. Tharp · 637 P.2d 961
- In re the Welfare of J.M. · 130 Wash. App. 912
- In Re Ross · 277 P.2d 335
- In Re Dependency of Schermer · 169 P.3d 452
- In Re Welfare of JM · 125 P.3d 245
- Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Iowa v. Verploeg · 227 P.2d 333
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- In Re the Dependency of Ca.R. · 191 Wash. App. 601
- Franks v. State (In re M.-A.F.-S.) · 421 P.3d 482
- Franks v. State (In re M.-A.F.-S.) · 415 P.3d 1239
Explore from here
Joel Penoyar’s Judicial Record · Wash. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).