In the Interest of J.W.T.

Decided March 30, 1994. Nathan Lincoln Hecht wrote the opinion for the court.

872 S.W.2d 189 · Cited 330 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Quilloin v. Walcott · 434 U.S. 246
• Meyer v. Nebraska · 262 U.S. 390
• Pierce v. Society of Sisters · 268 U.S. 510
• West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish · 300 U.S. 379
• Steven A. v. Rickie M. · 823 P.2d 1216
• Collins v. City of Harker Heights · 503 U.S. 115
• Davenport v. Garcia · 834 S.W.2d 4
• Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCraw · 126 S.W.2d 627
• Calder v. Bull · 3 U.S. 386
• Lucas v. United States · 757 S.W.2d 687
• Lively v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. · 120 S.W. 852
• National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson · 357 U.S. 449
• National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · 301 U.S. 1
• Palko v. Connecticut · 302 U.S. 319
• Reed v. Reed · 404 U.S. 71
• McDonald v. Mabee · 243 U.S. 90
• Hammer v. Dagenhart · 247 U.S. 251
• In Re Lisa R. · 532 P.2d 123
• In Re Adoption of BGS · 556 So. 2d 545
• Davis v. Davis · 521 S.W.2d 603
• Slawek v. Stroh · 215 N.W.2d 9
• Clark v. Clark · 643 S.W.2d 795
• Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · 348 U.S. 483
• United States v. Carolene Products Co. · 304 U.S. 144
• Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. · 59 U.S. 272

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• in the Interest of Baby Girl S., a Child · 407 S.W.3d 904
• In the Interest of Shockley · 123 S.W.3d 642
• Callender v. Skiles · 591 N.W.2d 182
• Pena v. State · 226 S.W.3d 634
• In the Interest of A.M. · 936 S.W.2d 59
• Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of America · 876 S.W.2d 154
• In the Interest of S.K.A., M.A., and SA., Minor Children · 236 S.W.3d 875
• Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Sherry · 46 S.W.3d 857
• In re V.V. · 349 S.W.3d 548
• in the Interest of O.R.F., a Child · 417 S.W.3d 24
• Brinkley v. King · 701 A.2d 176
• In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G., and C.G.L., Children · 385 S.W.3d 1
• in the Interest of R.J. Children · 381 S.W.3d 619
• In Re VV · 349 S.W.3d 548
• In the Interest of A.V. · 113 S.W.3d 355
• Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation · 469 S.W.3d 69
• In Re Doe · 19 S.W.3d 249
• in the Interest of S.S., a Child · 471 S.W.3d 915
• in the Interest of N. R., a Child · 101 S.W.3d 771
• Phillips v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services · 25 S.W.3d 348
• In the Interest of A.M. · 385 S.W.3d 74
• in the Interest of C.A.J., a Child · 459 S.W.3d 175
• Geoffrey Dugger v. Mary Ann Arredondo, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Joel Martinez · 408 S.W.3d 825
• in the Interest of S.A.H, a Minor Child · 420 S.W.3d 911
• State ex rel. Roy Allen S. v. Stone · 196 W. Va. 624

Explore from here

Nathan Lincoln Hecht’s Judicial Record · Tex. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).