in the Interest of N.R.C. and L.A.C.

Decided December 5, 2002. Eva M. Guzman wrote the opinion for the court.

94 S.W.3d 799 · Cited 97 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell · 811 S.W.2d 913
• Holley v. Adams · 544 S.W.2d 367
• Holick v. Smith · 685 S.W.2d 18
• Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert Blackmon · 841 S.W.2d 844
• Fletcher v. Blair · 874 S.W.2d 83
• In the Interest of S.G.S. · 53 S.W.3d 848
• Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals · 700 S.W.2d 916
• In the Interest of G. M. · 596 S.W.2d 846
• S.V. v. R.V. · 933 S.W.2d 1
• Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co. · 830 S.W.2d 911
• Eichelberger v. Eichelberger · 582 S.W.2d 395
• State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Gonzalez · 82 S.W.3d 322
• Braden v. Downey · 811 S.W.2d 922
• Love v. State · 861 S.W.2d 899
• Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. Caldwell · 850 S.W.2d 167
• In the Interest of Striegler · 915 S.W.2d 629
• United States Government v. Marks · 949 S.W.2d 320
• Bohatch v. Butler & Binion · 977 S.W.2d 543
• Tatum v. State · 798 S.W.2d 569
• Roberts v. Golden Crest Waters, Inc. · 1 S.W.3d 291
• Nikoloutsos v. Nikoloutsos · 47 S.W.3d 837

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Van Heerden v. Van Heerden · 321 S.W.3d 869
• Richard Mark Watts v. Ruth Oliver · 396 S.W.3d 124
• Taylor v. Taylor · 254 S.W.3d 527
• in the Interest of K.A.R. · 171 S.W.3d 705
• PNS Stores, Inc. v. Munguia · 484 S.W.3d 503
• In Re KAR · 171 S.W.3d 705
• In re Harrison · 557 S.W.3d 99
• In Re Brown · 277 S.W.3d 474
• In the Interest of J.N.L. · 528 S.W.3d 237
• In the Interest of K.A.W. · 133 S.W.3d 1
• Moreno Denoso v. State · 156 S.W.3d 166
• In Re Does 1-10 · 242 S.W.3d 805
• Zhou Pei and Shaun White v. Nicholas White, Mark Moersen, Taurus Manufacturing Co. and Optimas Manufacturing Solutions · 452 S.W.3d 527
• Alexander Shren-Yee Cheng v. Zhaoya Wang · 315 S.W.3d 668
• Cathey v. Meyer · 115 S.W.3d 644
• Lone Starr Multi-Theatres, Ltd. v. Max Interests, Ltd. · 365 S.W.3d 688
• PPC Transportation v. Metcalf · 254 S.W.3d 636
• Rose Gipson-Jelks v. Mae K. Gipson · 468 S.W.3d 600
• Thuesen v. Amerisure Insurance Co. · 487 S.W.3d 291
• In Re KAW · 133 S.W.3d 1
• In Re NRC · 94 S.W.3d 799
• IN RE THE ADOPTION OF: H.D.D, R.N.D., AND S.F.D., minors W.H.D. and S.G.D., Petitioners-Respondents v. S.M.D., and IN RE THE MATTER OF: R.N.D. AND S.F.D. W.H.D. Petitioner-Respondent v. S.M.D.
• In the Interest of L.M.S. & L.S.S., Minors.

Explore from here

Eva M. Guzman’s Judicial Record · Tex. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).