Kingsley v. Kingsley
Decided August 18, 1993. George Diamantis wrote the opinion for the court.
623 So. 2d 780 · Cited 70 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Padgett v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Services · 577 So. 2d 565
- Addington v. Texas · 441 U.S. 418
- Torres v. Van Eepoel · 98 So. 2d 735
- State v. Mischler · 488 So. 2d 523
- Parker v. Bowron · 40 Cal. 2d 344
- Marsh v. Marsh · 419 So. 2d 629
- Brown v. Ripley · 119 So. 2d 712
- P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services · 624 So. 2d 273
- In re T.W. · 551 So. 2d 1186
- Slomowitz v. Walker · 429 So. 2d 797
- Youngblood v. Taylor · 89 So. 2d 503
- Cohen v. Mohawk, Inc. · 137 So. 2d 222
- Moorhouse v. Ambassador Insurance · 383 N.W.2d 219
- General Development Corporation v. Kirk · 251 So. 2d 284
- Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel · 97 So. 2d 156
- In Interest of CMH · 413 So. 2d 418
- In Interest of KAF · 442 So. 2d 365
- In Interest of TD · 537 So. 2d 173
- In Re Guardianship of Browning · 543 So. 2d 258
- Keehn v. Joseph C. MacKey and Co. · 420 So. 2d 398
- Middlebrooks v. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MGT. DIST. · 529 So. 2d 1167
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. COMMERCIAL STANDARD INS. · 380 So. 2d 1066
- Smith v. Langford · 255 So. 2d 294
- In Interest of Baby Boy · 544 So. 2d 1136
- Williams v. DHRS · 589 So. 2d 359
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- AA v. Department of Children and Families · 852 So. 2d 318
- D.G. v. Department of Children & Families · 77 So. 3d 201
- J.S. v. S.A. · 912 So. 2d 650
- F.C. v. State, Department of Children & Families · 780 So. 2d 159
- Smith v. Rainey · 747 F. Supp. 2d 1327
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Miami-Dade County School Board · 439 F. Supp. 2d 1242
- In Re Interest of Fc · 780 So. 2d 159
- Js v. Sa · 912 So. 2d 650
- In Re Adoption of Baby EAW · 658 So. 2d 961
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Reno · 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167
- Dh v. Department of Children and Fam. · 769 So. 2d 424
- D.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc. · 271 So. 3d 870
- McKesson Drug Co. v. Williams · 706 So. 2d 352
- GT v. Adoption of AET · 725 So. 2d 404
- Peregood v. Cosmides · 663 So. 2d 665
- Gilbertson v. Boggs · 743 So. 2d 123
- Reid v. Estate of Sonder · 63 So. 3d 7
- NS v. Department of Children and Families · 36 So. 3d 776
- Dudley v. McCormick · 799 So. 2d 436
- R.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services · 33 So. 3d 710
- G.W.B. v. J.S.W. · 658 So. 2d 961
- GLS v. Dept. of Children and Families · 724 So. 2d 1181
- LF v. Department of Children and Families · 888 So. 2d 147
- LH v. Department of Health · 647 So. 2d 311
- Petition of Frazer · 721 A.2d 920
Explore from here
George Diamantis’s Judicial Record · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).