Lingner v. Lingner
Decided February 11, 1933. Grafton Green wrote the opinion for the court.
56 S.W.2d 749 · Cited 56 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Broch v. Broch · 47 S.W.2d 84
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Jeffrey Edmisten v. Kathy Edmisten
- Abney v. Abney · 433 S.W.2d 847
- Reed v. Reed · 304 P.2d 590
- Perrin v. Perrin · 299 S.W.2d 19
- Street v. Calvert · 541 S.W.2d 576
- Farrar v. Farrar · 553 S.W.2d 741
- Hyde v. Hyde · 562 S.W.2d 194
- Shannon Ex Rel. Shannon v. Board of Education · 286 S.W.2d 571
- Ripatti v. Ripatti · 494 P.2d 1025
- Thomasson v. Thomasson · 755 S.W.2d 779
- Martin v. Martin · 155 S.W.3d 126
- Baeyertz v. Baeyertz · 101 S.W.2d 689
- Browder v. Browder · 188 Tenn. 488
- Stephenson v. Stephenson · 298 S.W.2d 717
- Powers v. L. N.R. Co. · 194 S.W.2d 241
- Daniel v. Daniel · 171 So. 2d 180
- Riggs v. Riggs · 184 S.W.2d 9
- Aeyon Cho v. Dae-Young Jeong - Concurring
- Ronnie Gale Martin v. Deborah Elaine Kent Martin
Explore from here
Grafton Green’s Judicial Record · Tenn. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).