Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United States

Decided June 26, 1973. Charles Byron Renfrew wrote the opinion for the court.

363 F. Supp. 1238 · Cited 67 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• United States v. Mason · 412 U.S. 391
• Seminole Nation v. United States · 316 U.S. 286
• Berniker v. Berniker · 30 Cal. 2d 439
• United States v. Taylor · 104 U.S. 216
• Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton · 354 F. Supp. 252
• Warrington v. Charles Pfizer & Co. · 274 Cal. App. 2d 564
• Whitney v. Burnham · 248 P. 754
• Lynch v. John M. Redfield Foundation · 9 Cal. App. 3d 293
• Nash v. Wiseman · 227 F. Supp. 552
• Sakezzie v. Utah State Indian Affairs Commission · 215 F. Supp. 12
• Daney v. United States · 247 F. Supp. 533
• Neher v. United States · 265 F. Supp. 210

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Van De Kamp v. Bank of America · 204 Cal. App. 3d 819
• Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians v. NGV Gaming, Ltd. · 531 F.3d 767
• Pelt v. Utah · 611 F. Supp. 2d 1267
• Enos v. United States · 672 F. Supp. 1391
• United States v. Mitchell · 463 U.S. 206
• Buxton v. Buxton · 770 A.2d 152
• Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. State · 133 P.3d 767
• Ahuna v. Department of Hawaiian Home Lands · 640 P.2d 1161
• Cobell v. Babbitt · 91 F. Supp. 2d 1
• Cobell v. Babbitt · 30 F. Supp. 2d 24
• Pollard v. United States · 384 F. Supp. 304
• Cape Fox Corp. v. United States · 456 F. Supp. 784
• Maryland National Bank v. Cummins · 588 A.2d 1205
• Bray v. Department of State · 341 N.W.2d 92
• Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co. · 874 F. Supp. 1142
• St. Paul Intertribal Housing Board v. Reynolds · 564 F. Supp. 1408
• Smith v. United States · 515 F. Supp. 56
• Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. US, BUR. OF INDIAN AFF. · 714 F. Supp. 1546
• Cassedy v. Alland Investments Corp. · 982 So. 2d 719
• Towne v. Robbins · 339 F. Supp. 2d 1105
• Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co. · 863 F. Supp. 1389
• Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. United States

Explore from here

Charles Byron Renfrew’s Judicial Record · N.D. California · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).